<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (2) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96976</link>
    <description>The Companies Act definition of &quot;the Court&quot; governed enforcement provisions for inspection and access to company documents, so the High Court with jurisdiction under the Act could entertain the application. A disputed membership claim was not summarily decided in these proceedings because forfeiture, removal from the register, and lien issues were already pending in a suit. Treating the applicant as an outsider for the time being, the Court noted that the Act conferred inspection rights in some cases, copying rights in some cases on payment of fees, and no right to certified copies in others. Inspection was ordered, and copying was allowed only to the extent expressly authorised by the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:04:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (2) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96976</link>
      <description>The Companies Act definition of &quot;the Court&quot; governed enforcement provisions for inspection and access to company documents, so the High Court with jurisdiction under the Act could entertain the application. A disputed membership claim was not summarily decided in these proceedings because forfeiture, removal from the register, and lien issues were already pending in a suit. Treating the applicant as an outsider for the time being, the Court noted that the Act conferred inspection rights in some cases, copying rights in some cases on payment of fees, and no right to certified copies in others. Inspection was ordered, and copying was allowed only to the extent expressly authorised by the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>