https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96955 Prior dismissal of an earlier, prematurely withdrawn winding-up petition does not bar a fresh petition and non-payment of a subsequent call, standing alone, does not deprive a contributory of the right to present a winding-up petition; the call's validity and other facts may require inquiry. A provisional liquidator will not be appointed where opposition exists absent a clear, uncontested case justifying that drastic relief; instead the court may grant targeted interim measures. Accordingly the court refused a provisional liquidator but ordered an audit, stayed related suits, directed a shareholders' meeting and restrained withdrawals by the managing director pending further trial. en-us Thu, 15 May 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:32:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96955 Prior dismissal of an earlier, prematurely withdrawn winding-up petition does not bar a fresh petition and non-payment of a subsequent call, standing alone, does not deprive a contributory of the right to present a winding-up petition; the call's validity and other facts may require inquiry. A provisional liquidator will not be appointed where opposition exists absent a clear, uncontested case justifying that drastic relief; instead the court may grant targeted interim measures. Accordingly the court refused a provisional liquidator but ordered an audit, stayed related suits, directed a shareholders' meeting and restrained withdrawals by the managing director pending further trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 15 May 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96955