https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96952 Court jurisdiction to order a company general meeting arises where calling a valid meeting in the manner prescribed by the articles or the Companies Act has become impracticable. The statutory outer time limit for annual meetings does not ordinarily override the articles unless a mandatory statutory inconsistency exists. In determining impracticability, the Court may incidentally assess whether an alleged prior meeting was legally valid; it need not require parties to pursue a separate civil suit merely because validity is disputed. The District Judge could therefore direct the meeting after finding that no valid meeting had been called in the prescribed manner. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:27:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96952 Court jurisdiction to order a company general meeting arises where calling a valid meeting in the manner prescribed by the articles or the Companies Act has become impracticable. The statutory outer time limit for annual meetings does not ordinarily override the articles unless a mandatory statutory inconsistency exists. In determining impracticability, the Court may incidentally assess whether an alleged prior meeting was legally valid; it need not require parties to pursue a separate civil suit merely because validity is disputed. The District Judge could therefore direct the meeting after finding that no valid meeting had been called in the prescribed manner. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 05 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96952