<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (11) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96938</link>
    <description>A registered society was treated as a legal entity distinct from its members, so a suit was not defective merely because the same society appeared on both sides. Minority members could maintain a representative action without prior sanction where the challenge concerned acts alleged to be ultra vires, fraudulent, or oppressive to the minority, because such wrongs could be treated as wrongs to the society as a whole. The plaint also disclosed a sufficient cause of action against managing committee members, who were necessary parties for effective relief. However, allegations of fraud had to be pleaded with specific particulars, and the plaint was required to be amended on that aspect before the suit could proceed further.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:42:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (11) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96938</link>
      <description>A registered society was treated as a legal entity distinct from its members, so a suit was not defective merely because the same society appeared on both sides. Minority members could maintain a representative action without prior sanction where the challenge concerned acts alleged to be ultra vires, fraudulent, or oppressive to the minority, because such wrongs could be treated as wrongs to the society as a whole. The plaint also disclosed a sufficient cause of action against managing committee members, who were necessary parties for effective relief. However, allegations of fraud had to be pleaded with specific particulars, and the plaint was required to be amended on that aspect before the suit could proceed further.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>