<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (10) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96931</link>
    <description>Promissory note law: a negotiable instrument executed solely in an agent&#039;s name does not bind the company unless the instrument on its face or by necessary inference shows it was executed for the company; mere benefit to the company or after the fact evidence of purpose is insufficient, so the company is not liable and the suit against it fails. Joint family liability: where the promissory note was signed by the manager of a joint Hindu family, the family property is chargeable to the creditor and coparceners may be decreed liable to the extent of their shares; the Official Assignee&#039;s representation does not bar proceeding against those shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:02:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (10) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96931</link>
      <description>Promissory note law: a negotiable instrument executed solely in an agent&#039;s name does not bind the company unless the instrument on its face or by necessary inference shows it was executed for the company; mere benefit to the company or after the fact evidence of purpose is insufficient, so the company is not liable and the suit against it fails. Joint family liability: where the promissory note was signed by the manager of a joint Hindu family, the family property is chargeable to the creditor and coparceners may be decreed liable to the extent of their shares; the Official Assignee&#039;s representation does not bar proceeding against those shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>