<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (10) TMI 15 - IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96930</link>
    <description>An agreement will not be construed as preventing a contracting party from appointing a general manager unless that restriction is clearly expressed in its terms. Proper construction of the agreement showed no such bar, so the respondent company remained free to make the appointment. The issue was therefore decided against the appellant and in favour of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:01:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (10) TMI 15 - IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96930</link>
      <description>An agreement will not be construed as preventing a contracting party from appointing a general manager unless that restriction is clearly expressed in its terms. Proper construction of the agreement showed no such bar, so the respondent company remained free to make the appointment. The issue was therefore decided against the appellant and in favour of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 1945 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>