https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96928 Proceedings under section 235 of the Indian Companies Act against a director do not survive his death unless the statute itself clearly provides for continuation. The Madras High Court held that section 198 did not authorise extending the summary proceeding to the deceased director's estate, and that Order 22 Rule 4 and section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply only where the right to sue survives. As survival was not established under section 235, the legal representatives could not be brought on record and the proceeding could not continue against the heirs. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:57:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96928 Proceedings under section 235 of the Indian Companies Act against a director do not survive his death unless the statute itself clearly provides for continuation. The Madras High Court held that section 198 did not authorise extending the summary proceeding to the deceased director's estate, and that Order 22 Rule 4 and section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply only where the right to sue survives. As survival was not established under section 235, the legal representatives could not be brought on record and the proceeding could not continue against the heirs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 13 Jul 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96928