https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96926 Section 38 of the Indian Companies Act was confined to rectification of the register of members and, where appropriate, damages and costs; it did not extend to control of the company's management or business. A shareholder claiming entry on the register had no present right to possession or administration of the company's property during the proceeding. Order 40, Rule 1, read with section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, could not enlarge that limited jurisdiction or justify appointment of a receiver to displace the directors. The Court accordingly stated that no jurisdiction existed to appoint a receiver in rectification proceedings. en-us Mon, 09 Apr 1945 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:52:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96926 Section 38 of the Indian Companies Act was confined to rectification of the register of members and, where appropriate, damages and costs; it did not extend to control of the company's management or business. A shareholder claiming entry on the register had no present right to possession or administration of the company's property during the proceeding. Order 40, Rule 1, read with section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, could not enlarge that limited jurisdiction or justify appointment of a receiver to displace the directors. The Court accordingly stated that no jurisdiction existed to appoint a receiver in rectification proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 Apr 1945 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96926