<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (9) TMI 12 - CHIEF COURT OF OUDH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96915</link>
    <description>Registration of shares under the Companies Act requires the transferee to be a person or legally recognised entity capable of being entered in the register of members. A partnership firm is only a collective name for its partners and is not a distinct legal person for this purpose; the General Clauses Act definition of &quot;person&quot; does not apply where inconsistent with the Companies Act&#039;s subject and context. Consequently, a transfer made in a firm name cannot support substitution on the register. An article permitting directors to refuse registration without reasons does not exclude the court&#039;s jurisdiction to consider an otherwise maintainable registration application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (9) TMI 12 - CHIEF COURT OF OUDH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96915</link>
      <description>Registration of shares under the Companies Act requires the transferee to be a person or legally recognised entity capable of being entered in the register of members. A partnership firm is only a collective name for its partners and is not a distinct legal person for this purpose; the General Clauses Act definition of &quot;person&quot; does not apply where inconsistent with the Companies Act&#039;s subject and context. Consequently, a transfer made in a firm name cannot support substitution on the register. An article permitting directors to refuse registration without reasons does not exclude the court&#039;s jurisdiction to consider an otherwise maintainable registration application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>