https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96912 A foreign unregistered company that carried on recurring and substantial business in England through visiting directors could be wound up under section 338 of the Companies Act 1929 even without a formally established office there. The court distinguished the wording of section 338 from section 343, holding that the winding-up jurisdiction was not limited to companies with an established place of business in the narrower statutory sense. On the facts, the company had in fact maintained a place of business in England and was carrying on business for the purposes of the winding-up provisions, so jurisdiction existed and the winding-up petition was granted. en-us Mon, 12 Jun 1944 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:03:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96912 A foreign unregistered company that carried on recurring and substantial business in England through visiting directors could be wound up under section 338 of the Companies Act 1929 even without a formally established office there. The court distinguished the wording of section 338 from section 343, holding that the winding-up jurisdiction was not limited to companies with an established place of business in the narrower statutory sense. On the facts, the company had in fact maintained a place of business in England and was carrying on business for the purposes of the winding-up provisions, so jurisdiction existed and the winding-up petition was granted. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Jun 1944 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96912