<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1944 (1) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96903</link>
    <description>Section 152 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as a special and mandatory scheme for company arbitrations, requiring a company that referred a dispute to arbitration to use the Indian Arbitration Act, 1899. The words allowing reference &quot;in accordance with the Indian Arbitration Act, 1899&quot; were read as making that Act the exclusive route, and the phrase &quot;in pursuance of this Act&quot; was understood to apply the Arbitration Act by force of the Companies Act itself. On that construction, the territorial limitation in Section 2 of the Arbitration Act, 1899 did not restrict company arbitrations, and Schedule II of the Civil Procedure Code was not available as an alternative procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:18:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1944 (1) TMI 13 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96903</link>
      <description>Section 152 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913 was treated as a special and mandatory scheme for company arbitrations, requiring a company that referred a dispute to arbitration to use the Indian Arbitration Act, 1899. The words allowing reference &quot;in accordance with the Indian Arbitration Act, 1899&quot; were read as making that Act the exclusive route, and the phrase &quot;in pursuance of this Act&quot; was understood to apply the Arbitration Act by force of the Companies Act itself. On that construction, the territorial limitation in Section 2 of the Arbitration Act, 1899 did not restrict company arbitrations, and Schedule II of the Civil Procedure Code was not available as an alternative procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 1944 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>