<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1941 (12) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96880</link>
    <description>A decree obtained in the name of a joint Hindu family trading firm was treated as valid where the forum&#039;s procedure permitted such a firm to sue or be sued in the firm name, so the decree was not a nullity. The court also held that the assignee acquired an operative right to enforce the decree because no legal infirmity in the assignment was shown. The plaintiff failed to prove full satisfaction or adjustment of the decree before assignment, as the evidence was unreliable and showed only partial discharge. On those findings, the plaintiff had no basis for declaratory or injunctive relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1941 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1941 (12) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96880</link>
      <description>A decree obtained in the name of a joint Hindu family trading firm was treated as valid where the forum&#039;s procedure permitted such a firm to sue or be sued in the firm name, so the decree was not a nullity. The court also held that the assignee acquired an operative right to enforce the decree because no legal infirmity in the assignment was shown. The plaintiff failed to prove full satisfaction or adjustment of the decree before assignment, as the evidence was unreliable and showed only partial discharge. On those findings, the plaintiff had no basis for declaratory or injunctive relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 1941 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>