<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1941 (3) TMI 16 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION AND IN THE COURT OF APPEA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96858</link>
    <description>For the statutory exception to apply, the court looks to the substance of the debenture transaction and not its form. Where the money was provided by a third party, the company&#039;s bank account operated only as a conduit, and the arrangement was designed to prefer selected creditors rather than confer a genuine commercial benefit on the company, the cash is not treated as paid to the company within section 266 of the Companies Act 1929. On those facts, the floating charge was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1941 (3) TMI 16 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION AND IN THE COURT OF APPEA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96858</link>
      <description>For the statutory exception to apply, the court looks to the substance of the debenture transaction and not its form. Where the money was provided by a third party, the company&#039;s bank account operated only as a conduit, and the arrangement was designed to prefer selected creditors rather than confer a genuine commercial benefit on the company, the cash is not treated as paid to the company within section 266 of the Companies Act 1929. On those facts, the floating charge was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 1941 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>