https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96838 A company's duty to keep an accurate register of directors and notify changes in their particulars was treated as satisfied by a single complete return covering all alterations since the last filing. The statutory requirement to use the prescribed form and include the particulars of all directors did not require separate forms for each change, because the operative obligation was to furnish the Registrar with correct information within the prescribed time. Where one filing conveyed the requisite details and made good the default, non-filing of multiple forms did not prevent compliance. The Court therefore accepted the single consolidated form as sufficient. en-us Fri, 04 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:51:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96838 A company's duty to keep an accurate register of directors and notify changes in their particulars was treated as satisfied by a single complete return covering all alterations since the last filing. The statutory requirement to use the prescribed form and include the particulars of all directors did not require separate forms for each change, because the operative obligation was to furnish the Registrar with correct information within the prescribed time. Where one filing conveyed the requisite details and made good the default, non-filing of multiple forms did not prevent compliance. The Court therefore accepted the single consolidated form as sufficient. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Oct 1940 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96838