<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (7) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96833</link>
    <description>Company articles cannot expel a shareholder, deprive membership, or compel a share transfer unless those powers existed when exercised and statutory transfer requirements are met. A later amendment cannot retrospectively validate an earlier expulsion, particularly where made without notice to the affected shareholder. A share transfer requires a proper instrument of transfer, and company articles cannot override that statutory requirement. Striking a shareholder&#039;s name from the register without a valid transfer constitutes an omission rectifiable under section 38(1). The alleged transferee&#039;s absence does not bar rectification where no lawful transfer occurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:33:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (7) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96833</link>
      <description>Company articles cannot expel a shareholder, deprive membership, or compel a share transfer unless those powers existed when exercised and statutory transfer requirements are met. A later amendment cannot retrospectively validate an earlier expulsion, particularly where made without notice to the affected shareholder. A share transfer requires a proper instrument of transfer, and company articles cannot override that statutory requirement. Striking a shareholder&#039;s name from the register without a valid transfer constitutes an omission rectifiable under section 38(1). The alleged transferee&#039;s absence does not bar rectification where no lawful transfer occurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>