<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (7) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96832</link>
    <description>In voluntary winding up, the statutory scheme was treated as exhaustive on who may invoke the court&#039;s jurisdiction to remove or appoint a liquidator. The Act identified shareholders, creditors and the liquidator as the persons interested in such proceedings, and that class was held to be exclusive. As the Registrar of Companies was not among the persons expressly authorised to make such an application, he lacked locus standi and could not maintain the petition for removal of the voluntary liquidator or appointment of another liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:31:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (7) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96832</link>
      <description>In voluntary winding up, the statutory scheme was treated as exhaustive on who may invoke the court&#039;s jurisdiction to remove or appoint a liquidator. The Act identified shareholders, creditors and the liquidator as the persons interested in such proceedings, and that class was held to be exclusive. As the Registrar of Companies was not among the persons expressly authorised to make such an application, he lacked locus standi and could not maintain the petition for removal of the voluntary liquidator or appointment of another liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>