<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (5) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96827</link>
    <description>Section 12 of the Limitation Act applies to appeals under section 202 of the Companies Act from a Single Judge&#039;s original jurisdiction order, so the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the appealed order is excluded even if the memorandum of appeal need not file that copy. Letters Patent appeals governed by limitation rules framed under delegated authority are treated as special law under section 29 of the Limitation Act, making section 12 applicable unless expressly excluded. The contrary view that exclusion depends on filing the copy was rejected, and the earlier inconsistent approach was overruled to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (5) TMI 16 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96827</link>
      <description>Section 12 of the Limitation Act applies to appeals under section 202 of the Companies Act from a Single Judge&#039;s original jurisdiction order, so the time requisite for obtaining a copy of the appealed order is excluded even if the memorandum of appeal need not file that copy. Letters Patent appeals governed by limitation rules framed under delegated authority are treated as special law under section 29 of the Limitation Act, making section 12 applicable unless expressly excluded. The contrary view that exclusion depends on filing the copy was rejected, and the earlier inconsistent approach was overruled to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>