<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (8) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96798</link>
    <description>Stay of proceedings under section 277N was treated as available only where the company showed a merely temporary inability to meet its obligations. The Court found that the Registrar&#039;s report and the material before it showed liabilities substantially exceeding assets, and the proposed composition scheme itself contemplated payment to depositors only over several years, which was inconsistent with a short-lived financial embarrassment. On that basis, the Court concluded that judicial protection was not intended for an essentially insolvent company so as to bar creditors from ordinary remedies, and the stay was withdrawn with the application dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:09:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (8) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96798</link>
      <description>Stay of proceedings under section 277N was treated as available only where the company showed a merely temporary inability to meet its obligations. The Court found that the Registrar&#039;s report and the material before it showed liabilities substantially exceeding assets, and the proposed composition scheme itself contemplated payment to depositors only over several years, which was inconsistent with a short-lived financial embarrassment. On that basis, the Court concluded that judicial protection was not intended for an essentially insolvent company so as to bar creditors from ordinary remedies, and the stay was withdrawn with the application dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>