<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (3) TMI 9 - IN THE OUDH CHIEF COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96744</link>
    <description>An administrator holding valid letters of administration for a deceased shareholder&#039;s estate may be treated as a contributory where the company&#039;s articles recognise executors or administrators and the shares are recorded as devolved through death. On that basis, the administrator may maintain a winding-up petition. Where serious allegations against company officers indicate that the company&#039;s affairs require investigation, a court-supervised winding up is preferred over voluntary liquidation because it better serves justice and equity. The commentary states that the objections failed, the stay was set aside, and the winding-up application was allowed to proceed before the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (3) TMI 9 - IN THE OUDH CHIEF COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96744</link>
      <description>An administrator holding valid letters of administration for a deceased shareholder&#039;s estate may be treated as a contributory where the company&#039;s articles recognise executors or administrators and the shares are recorded as devolved through death. On that basis, the administrator may maintain a winding-up petition. Where serious allegations against company officers indicate that the company&#039;s affairs require investigation, a court-supervised winding up is preferred over voluntary liquidation because it better serves justice and equity. The commentary states that the objections failed, the stay was set aside, and the winding-up application was allowed to proceed before the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>