<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (10) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96730</link>
    <description>A summary proceeding under the Companies Act may be used to determine a liquidator&#039;s claim where monies were received by the managing agent in his capacity as agent; accordingly the liquidator&#039;s Section 185 application was maintainable. Claims for arrears of salary and the two disputed items were disallowed because they were not pressed or were formally disallowed by directors&#039; resolution. The agent&#039;s contractual right of retainer and lien for costs and liabilities may be recognised but require accounting and factual inquiry; therefore accounts should be taken to a proximate date and any balance prima facie payable to the liquidator directed to be paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (10) TMI 9 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96730</link>
      <description>A summary proceeding under the Companies Act may be used to determine a liquidator&#039;s claim where monies were received by the managing agent in his capacity as agent; accordingly the liquidator&#039;s Section 185 application was maintainable. Claims for arrears of salary and the two disputed items were disallowed because they were not pressed or were formally disallowed by directors&#039; resolution. The agent&#039;s contractual right of retainer and lien for costs and liabilities may be recognised but require accounting and factual inquiry; therefore accounts should be taken to a proximate date and any balance prima facie payable to the liquidator directed to be paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>