<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (9) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96729</link>
    <description>The plaintiff&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the suit was dismissed with costs throughout. The court held that directors of an insolvent company should not secure their own debts preferentially. Directors must act in the best interest of the company and its creditors, ensuring equitable treatment for all creditors. The judgment emphasized that directors should not prioritize their debts over other creditors, reinforcing the principle of fair treatment in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (9) TMI 17 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96729</link>
      <description>The plaintiff&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the suit was dismissed with costs throughout. The court held that directors of an insolvent company should not secure their own debts preferentially. Directors must act in the best interest of the company and its creditors, ensuring equitable treatment for all creditors. The judgment emphasized that directors should not prioritize their debts over other creditors, reinforcing the principle of fair treatment in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>