<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (5) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96728</link>
    <description>A sanctioned scheme under section 153 of the Companies Act could not be modified by the Court after approval unless the altered proposal was again considered by the affected class; the proper course was appeal against the sanction order or execution proceedings on the decree. The discussion also notes the competing view on whether a depositor who becomes a decree-holder remains within the depositor class, but that point was not finally resolved in the petitioner&#039;s favour. Relief was also refused because the petition was brought after substantial delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (5) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96728</link>
      <description>A sanctioned scheme under section 153 of the Companies Act could not be modified by the Court after approval unless the altered proposal was again considered by the affected class; the proper course was appeal against the sanction order or execution proceedings on the decree. The discussion also notes the competing view on whether a depositor who becomes a decree-holder remains within the depositor class, but that point was not finally resolved in the petitioner&#039;s favour. Relief was also refused because the petition was brought after substantial delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96728</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>