<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (9) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD — FULL BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96720</link>
    <description>Contravention of a Companies Act provision imposing a daily fine on an unqualified person acting as director was treated as a penal breach, not a merely civil default, and was therefore an offence punishable with fine. The Full Bench further held that the Act did not confer original criminal jurisdiction on the High Court to take cognizance and try such offences directly on an application under Section 85. In the absence of an express special forum, offences under the Act were to be dealt with through the ordinary criminal procedure, with cognizance taken in the manner authorised by that procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (9) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD — FULL BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96720</link>
      <description>Contravention of a Companies Act provision imposing a daily fine on an unqualified person acting as director was treated as a penal breach, not a merely civil default, and was therefore an offence punishable with fine. The Full Bench further held that the Act did not confer original criminal jurisdiction on the High Court to take cognizance and try such offences directly on an application under Section 85. In the absence of an express special forum, offences under the Act were to be dealt with through the ordinary criminal procedure, with cognizance taken in the manner authorised by that procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>