https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96719 A court may recall and cancel its own invalid ex parte order where a mandatory precondition was not satisfied and no vested right has accrued. Here, confirmation of alterations to a memorandum of association under the Companies Act had been made ex parte, but approval of the Local Government was first required for a company registered under section 26. The objection that the Court could not go behind its earlier order was rejected because the duty to correct an erroneous order is distinct from review. The Court therefore had jurisdiction to set aside the prior confirmation and keep the alteration application pending until local approval was obtained. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:45:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96719 A court may recall and cancel its own invalid ex parte order where a mandatory precondition was not satisfied and no vested right has accrued. Here, confirmation of alterations to a memorandum of association under the Companies Act had been made ex parte, but approval of the Local Government was first required for a company registered under section 26. The objection that the Court could not go behind its earlier order was rejected because the duty to correct an erroneous order is distinct from review. The Court therefore had jurisdiction to set aside the prior confirmation and keep the alteration application pending until local approval was obtained. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 Sep 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96719