https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96708 A company's statutory duty to maintain members' records and a member's corresponding right to inspect and obtain copies are enforceable even where the Act does not expressly provide that precise remedy. Although the Companies Act, 1913 expressly mentioned a penalty for refusal and power to compel inspection, the Court treated the omission of an express order for delivery of a copy as non-exclusionary. Where a statute creates a right and imposes a corresponding obligation, the court vested with jurisdiction under that statute may grant appropriate mandatory relief so the right is effective. The District Judge therefore had jurisdiction to direct supply of the register copy. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96708 A company's statutory duty to maintain members' records and a member's corresponding right to inspect and obtain copies are enforceable even where the Act does not expressly provide that precise remedy. Although the Companies Act, 1913 expressly mentioned a penalty for refusal and power to compel inspection, the Court treated the omission of an express order for delivery of a copy as non-exclusionary. Where a statute creates a right and imposes a corresponding obligation, the court vested with jurisdiction under that statute may grant appropriate mandatory relief so the right is effective. The District Judge therefore had jurisdiction to direct supply of the register copy. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 13 Feb 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96708