https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96704 A refusal to entertain objections in execution was held revisable where the executing court declined to hear the objection altogether, because the availability of a separate suit did not bar revision in that situation. The text further states that objections to attachment of property in execution proceedings did not require prior leave under the Companies Act merely because the decree-holder was in liquidation, as the objections formed part of the defence available in execution and fell within the executing court's jurisdiction under Order XXI. The order refusing to hear the objections was set aside and the matter remanded for decision on merits. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96704 A refusal to entertain objections in execution was held revisable where the executing court declined to hear the objection altogether, because the availability of a separate suit did not bar revision in that situation. The text further states that objections to attachment of property in execution proceedings did not require prior leave under the Companies Act merely because the decree-holder was in liquidation, as the objections formed part of the defence available in execution and fell within the executing court's jurisdiction under Order XXI. The order refusing to hear the objections was set aside and the matter remanded for decision on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 20 Jan 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96704