https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96686 The court, presided over by Crossman, J., ruled that the interrogatories sought by the plaintiff were not permissible under Article 16 of the company's articles of association. The judge clarified that directors are not obligated to specify grounds for their actions, leading to the conclusion that the requested interrogatories were not allowed. Additionally, the court held that Article 16 applies to both members and non-members seeking registration, extending its protection to all individuals. The judge emphasized that agreements can restrict the scope of discovery, including the ability to request specific information through interrogatories, and based on existing agreements, denied the permission to request interrogatories in this case. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:00:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96686 The court, presided over by Crossman, J., ruled that the interrogatories sought by the plaintiff were not permissible under Article 16 of the company's articles of association. The judge clarified that directors are not obligated to specify grounds for their actions, leading to the conclusion that the requested interrogatories were not allowed. Additionally, the court held that Article 16 applies to both members and non-members seeking registration, extending its protection to all individuals. The judge emphasized that agreements can restrict the scope of discovery, including the ability to request specific information through interrogatories, and based on existing agreements, denied the permission to request interrogatories in this case. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 31 Jul 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96686