https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96678 Where a specific procedural rule prescribes a time-limit for objections to notices, that specific limitation governs over a general limitation statute, and the specific thirty day period under the procedural rule applies rather than the three year general limitation. Separately, a notice signed by an officer of a corporate liquidator acting with authority is not invalid for want of the liquidator's personal signature; such omission is an irregularity that does not vitiate the notice where the officer is empowered to act on the corporate body's behalf. en-us Thu, 16 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:38:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96678 Where a specific procedural rule prescribes a time-limit for objections to notices, that specific limitation governs over a general limitation statute, and the specific thirty day period under the procedural rule applies rather than the three year general limitation. Separately, a notice signed by an officer of a corporate liquidator acting with authority is not invalid for want of the liquidator's personal signature; such omission is an irregularity that does not vitiate the notice where the officer is empowered to act on the corporate body's behalf. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 16 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96678