https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96677 A claim for fraudulent concealment causing direct pecuniary loss survived against the executors because the statutory exception to survival of actions was confined to personal injuries, not injury to property. The suit was also within limitation, since in a fraud-based claim time ran from discovery of the fraud and the evidence showed late discovery. Damages were confined to the loss proximately caused by the concealment, not the entire embezzled sum, because the false receipts did not cause the original defalcation. The quantum of recoverable loss was therefore remitted for fresh determination. en-us Thu, 09 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:37:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96677 A claim for fraudulent concealment causing direct pecuniary loss survived against the executors because the statutory exception to survival of actions was confined to personal injuries, not injury to property. The suit was also within limitation, since in a fraud-based claim time ran from discovery of the fraud and the evidence showed late discovery. Damages were confined to the loss proximately caused by the concealment, not the entire embezzled sum, because the false receipts did not cause the original defalcation. The quantum of recoverable loss was therefore remitted for fresh determination. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96677