<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1935 (5) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96676</link>
    <description>A fraud-based pecuniary claim was held to survive against a deceased wrongdoer&#039;s estate because the statutory exception to actio personalis moritur cum persona was confined to personal injuries, not property loss. The suit was also treated as in time, since limitation ran from discovery of the fraud, and earlier company liquidation proceedings did not extinguish the independent tort claim. Liability arose only from the agent&#039;s false receipts used to conceal the embezzlement, so recoverable damages were limited to the loss proximately caused by that concealment. The amount recoverable required further inquiry, and the matter was remitted for quantification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:37:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1935 (5) TMI 22 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96676</link>
      <description>A fraud-based pecuniary claim was held to survive against a deceased wrongdoer&#039;s estate because the statutory exception to actio personalis moritur cum persona was confined to personal injuries, not property loss. The suit was also treated as in time, since limitation ran from discovery of the fraud, and earlier company liquidation proceedings did not extinguish the independent tort claim. Liability arose only from the agent&#039;s false receipts used to conceal the embezzlement, so recoverable damages were limited to the loss proximately caused by that concealment. The amount recoverable required further inquiry, and the matter was remitted for quantification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1935 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>