<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96632</link>
    <description>A bond and certificate scheme was analysed as being outside the company&#039;s memorandum because the fund could be raised only in the prescribed manner, and the lottery-based machinery used for the bonds did not fall within those powers. The scheme was also unlawful because it necessarily involved a lottery without Government authority, attracting the statutory bar on such arrangements. Contributors were not treated as in pari delicto to the extent the legislation protected them, so recovery depended on how far the money had been applied. Amounts already paid out in prizes, loans, or valid charitable allocation were not recoverable; only the remaining identifiable balance was available for proportionate restitution after deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (12) TMI 26 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96632</link>
      <description>A bond and certificate scheme was analysed as being outside the company&#039;s memorandum because the fund could be raised only in the prescribed manner, and the lottery-based machinery used for the bonds did not fall within those powers. The scheme was also unlawful because it necessarily involved a lottery without Government authority, attracting the statutory bar on such arrangements. Contributors were not treated as in pari delicto to the extent the legislation protected them, so recovery depended on how far the money had been applied. Amounts already paid out in prizes, loans, or valid charitable allocation were not recoverable; only the remaining identifiable balance was available for proportionate restitution after deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>