<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (12) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96629</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the suit, holding that the minority plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the majority-approved resolutions. The court found no grounds for interference as the majority of shareholders had ratified the resolutions. The plaintiffs&#039; allegations of fraud and ultra vires acts were deemed insufficient, leading to the court allowing the demurrer and awarding costs against the plaintiffs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (12) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96629</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the suit, holding that the minority plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the majority-approved resolutions. The court found no grounds for interference as the majority of shareholders had ratified the resolutions. The plaintiffs&#039; allegations of fraud and ultra vires acts were deemed insufficient, leading to the court allowing the demurrer and awarding costs against the plaintiffs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>