<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (11) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96625</link>
    <description>A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding up is treated as void subject to the court&#039;s power to validate it under section 227(2) of the Companies Act, 1913; the provision applies to an actual post-commencement transfer and does not make validation unavailable where the circumstances justify it. Where shares are already subject to an effectively enforced floating charge, a purchaser in execution takes no better title than the transferor, and the debenture holders&#039; claim prevails over the execution sale. The operative effect is that post-winding-up share transfers may be validated by the court, while an earlier enforcement of the floating charge defeats a later purchaser&#039;s title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:15:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (11) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96625</link>
      <description>A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding up is treated as void subject to the court&#039;s power to validate it under section 227(2) of the Companies Act, 1913; the provision applies to an actual post-commencement transfer and does not make validation unavailable where the circumstances justify it. Where shares are already subject to an effectively enforced floating charge, a purchaser in execution takes no better title than the transferor, and the debenture holders&#039; claim prevails over the execution sale. The operative effect is that post-winding-up share transfers may be validated by the court, while an earlier enforcement of the floating charge defeats a later purchaser&#039;s title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>