<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (7) TMI 10 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96621</link>
    <description>A company membership rule requiring a member&#039;s name to be posted on the notice board after default was treated as directory because it was inserted for the company&#039;s benefit and could be waived by the company. On the facts, the objector had admitted membership, paid subscriptions up to 31 December 1930, and had not formally resigned. As there was no clear proof that the prescribed cessation procedure had been followed, no presumption arose that membership had ended, and the continued appearance of the name on the register at liquidation supported ongoing membership. The objector was therefore properly included in the list of contributories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (7) TMI 10 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96621</link>
      <description>A company membership rule requiring a member&#039;s name to be posted on the notice board after default was treated as directory because it was inserted for the company&#039;s benefit and could be waived by the company. On the facts, the objector had admitted membership, paid subscriptions up to 31 December 1930, and had not formally resigned. As there was no clear proof that the prescribed cessation procedure had been followed, no presumption arose that membership had ended, and the continued appearance of the name on the register at liquidation supported ongoing membership. The objector was therefore properly included in the list of contributories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>