<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (12) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96617</link>
    <description>A Bench under section 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act should not itself replace unsupported and conflicting trial findings with fresh factual determinations; the proper course is to order a retrial. The document also states that title to shares under the Sale of Goods Act passes only when the transfer endorsement is completed and communicated, so that the shares are appropriated as specific goods in a deliverable state. The superfluous signature of a judge who had not heard the matter did not invalidate the judgment where it was in substance prepared and signed by the judges who actually heard it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:46:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (12) TMI 6 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96617</link>
      <description>A Bench under section 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act should not itself replace unsupported and conflicting trial findings with fresh factual determinations; the proper course is to order a retrial. The document also states that title to shares under the Sale of Goods Act passes only when the transfer endorsement is completed and communicated, so that the shares are appropriated as specific goods in a deliverable state. The superfluous signature of a judge who had not heard the matter did not invalidate the judgment where it was in substance prepared and signed by the judges who actually heard it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>