<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (1) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96606</link>
    <description>Where the articles permit a general meeting to determine the number of directors, an increase in that number does not necessarily amount to an alteration of the articles and need not require a special resolution; on that footing, the directors elected under the revised strength were treated as validly appointed. The board could delegate authority to dismiss servants, so a power of attorney authorised the dismissal of the general manager, while a meeting held without notice to duly elected directors could not validly elect a chairman or pass binding resolutions. A temporary injunction was justified to protect prima facie management rights and prevent continuing interference pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:57:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (1) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96606</link>
      <description>Where the articles permit a general meeting to determine the number of directors, an increase in that number does not necessarily amount to an alteration of the articles and need not require a special resolution; on that footing, the directors elected under the revised strength were treated as validly appointed. The board could delegate authority to dismiss servants, so a power of attorney authorised the dismissal of the general manager, while a meeting held without notice to duly elected directors could not validly elect a chairman or pass binding resolutions. A temporary injunction was justified to protect prima facie management rights and prevent continuing interference pending trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>