<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (9) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96599</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the appellant&#039;s shares were validly forfeited, and his name should not be entered on the register of shareholders. The appeal was allowed with costs against the company. The judgment highlighted the significance of interpreting the Articles of Association and presumptions of proper authorization by the directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (9) TMI 12 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96599</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the appellant&#039;s shares were validly forfeited, and his name should not be entered on the register of shareholders. The appeal was allowed with costs against the company. The judgment highlighted the significance of interpreting the Articles of Association and presumptions of proper authorization by the directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>