<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (5) TMI 6 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96593</link>
    <description>Section 251 of the Companies Act 1929 was construed as part of the voluntary winding-up provisions and not as extending to compulsory winding-up. The court held that an arrangement under that section must relate to a company properly about to be wound up, and that the word &quot;arrangement&quot; did not naturally include a compromise properly so called. On the facts, a composition that would have left the company solvent was outside section 251 and did not bind the dissenting creditor. The majority creditors&#039; wishes were relevant, and the matter was left to stand over so that a scheme under section 153 could be considered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (5) TMI 6 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96593</link>
      <description>Section 251 of the Companies Act 1929 was construed as part of the voluntary winding-up provisions and not as extending to compulsory winding-up. The court held that an arrangement under that section must relate to a company properly about to be wound up, and that the word &quot;arrangement&quot; did not naturally include a compromise properly so called. On the facts, a composition that would have left the company solvent was outside section 251 and did not bind the dissenting creditor. The majority creditors&#039; wishes were relevant, and the matter was left to stand over so that a scheme under section 153 could be considered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>