<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (2) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96591</link>
    <description>Unpaid share capital is enforceable only when a valid call is made and notified in the manner required by the articles of association and the governing statute; a directors&#039; resolution alone does not create an enforceable liability. Because no valid notice of call had been served, the claim for the balance on the shares failed for want of cause of action. A further objection that the appeals were incompetent because the suits were cognizable by a Court of Small Causes was rejected under the relevant Companies Act provisions, which governed the contributory dispute and appellate forum. The lower appellate decrees were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:06:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (2) TMI 23 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96591</link>
      <description>Unpaid share capital is enforceable only when a valid call is made and notified in the manner required by the articles of association and the governing statute; a directors&#039; resolution alone does not create an enforceable liability. Because no valid notice of call had been served, the claim for the balance on the shares failed for want of cause of action. A further objection that the appeals were incompetent because the suits were cognizable by a Court of Small Causes was rejected under the relevant Companies Act provisions, which governed the contributory dispute and appellate forum. The lower appellate decrees were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>