<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (1) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96575</link>
    <description>A person who applies for shares, consents to act as a director, and is treated in the company records as a member may be bound as a shareholder and contributory, even if he later questions the transaction. The note states that the absence of a prospectus or objections to the mode of payment did not prevent completed membership where the surrounding correspondence and records showed assent. It also states that resolutions passed at a local board meeting and acts done by a de facto director could be protected by the statutory curative provision, so defects in appointment did not invalidate the allotment. A delayed denial of membership was treated as unavailable against the company in liquidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (1) TMI 18 - HIGH COURT OF LAHORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96575</link>
      <description>A person who applies for shares, consents to act as a director, and is treated in the company records as a member may be bound as a shareholder and contributory, even if he later questions the transaction. The note states that the absence of a prospectus or objections to the mode of payment did not prevent completed membership where the surrounding correspondence and records showed assent. It also states that resolutions passed at a local board meeting and acts done by a de facto director could be protected by the statutory curative provision, so defects in appointment did not invalidate the allotment. A delayed denial of membership was treated as unavailable against the company in liquidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>