<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (12) TMI 10 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96573</link>
    <description>A contributory&#039;s liability in liquidation cannot be enlarged beyond the statutory limit recoverable after crediting assets, A contributories&#039; contributions, and pre-membership debts. Excess proceeds realised from calls on B contributories, after proper deduction of costs, were therefore refundable, as retention of the surplus would exceed the statutory liability. At the same time, where needed to achieve equal distribution among all B contributories, the liquidator could enforce payment of the calls or unpaid balances, since liquidation procedure remains adaptable until distribution is complete. The controlling principle was that calls are only machinery for collecting and distributing the fund pari passu among those liable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (12) TMI 10 - IN THE CHANCERY DIVISION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96573</link>
      <description>A contributory&#039;s liability in liquidation cannot be enlarged beyond the statutory limit recoverable after crediting assets, A contributories&#039; contributions, and pre-membership debts. Excess proceeds realised from calls on B contributories, after proper deduction of costs, were therefore refundable, as retention of the surplus would exceed the statutory liability. At the same time, where needed to achieve equal distribution among all B contributories, the liquidator could enforce payment of the calls or unpaid balances, since liquidation procedure remains adaptable until distribution is complete. The controlling principle was that calls are only machinery for collecting and distributing the fund pari passu among those liable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>