<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (7) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96566</link>
    <description>Appellate standing in company liquidation requires a present legal interest adversely affected by the refusal to sanction a compromise or arrangement. Under the Companies Act, liquidators, creditors and contributories are principally concerned and bound by a scheme during winding up, while the Court may consider creditors&#039; and contributories&#039; wishes. A third party that merely proposes a scheme has only a prospective and contingent interest if it is sanctioned, not a present interest in the liquidation. Participation as a party before the lower court does not itself create appellate standing. Such a proposer therefore cannot appeal refusal of scheme sanction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (7) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96566</link>
      <description>Appellate standing in company liquidation requires a present legal interest adversely affected by the refusal to sanction a compromise or arrangement. Under the Companies Act, liquidators, creditors and contributories are principally concerned and bound by a scheme during winding up, while the Court may consider creditors&#039; and contributories&#039; wishes. A third party that merely proposes a scheme has only a prospective and contingent interest if it is sanctioned, not a present interest in the liquidation. Participation as a party before the lower court does not itself create appellate standing. Such a proposer therefore cannot appeal refusal of scheme sanction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>