https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96565 Application for leave to levy execution on a certificate for recovery of a public demand was refused; the court held that questions of priority between a Crown public demand and other creditors must be resolved within the statutory winding up framework rather than by permitting execution in isolation. The absence of notice to the Official Liquidator and incomplete argument on winding up priority were material, and the Crown's historical prerogative priority does not justify bypassing the statutory scheme where legislative provisions for priority operate. The priority issue is to be adjudicated in the winding up proceedings. en-us Mon, 18 May 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:26:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96565 Application for leave to levy execution on a certificate for recovery of a public demand was refused; the court held that questions of priority between a Crown public demand and other creditors must be resolved within the statutory winding up framework rather than by permitting execution in isolation. The absence of notice to the Official Liquidator and incomplete argument on winding up priority were material, and the Crown's historical prerogative priority does not justify bypassing the statutory scheme where legislative provisions for priority operate. The priority issue is to be adjudicated in the winding up proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 18 May 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96565