<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (12) TMI 14 - IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96559</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the ordinary shareholders, affirming that the phrase &quot;dividends equal to those paid on the preferred shares&quot; in the company&#039;s letters patent referred to a cumulative consideration of dividends over time rather than a singular payment. This decision aimed to ensure uniformity in profit distribution between preferred and ordinary shareholders, preventing fluctuations based on directors&#039; discretion. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent and fair profit-sharing practices, ultimately dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower court&#039;s decision in favor of the ordinary shareholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:04:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (12) TMI 14 - IN THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96559</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the ordinary shareholders, affirming that the phrase &quot;dividends equal to those paid on the preferred shares&quot; in the company&#039;s letters patent referred to a cumulative consideration of dividends over time rather than a singular payment. This decision aimed to ensure uniformity in profit distribution between preferred and ordinary shareholders, preventing fluctuations based on directors&#039; discretion. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent and fair profit-sharing practices, ultimately dismissing the appeal and upholding the lower court&#039;s decision in favor of the ordinary shareholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>