<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1929 (8) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96527</link>
    <description>Secured creditors were granted leave to continue a pre-existing mortgage suit during winding up to quantify their charge, but the court refused to displace the Official Liquidator&#039;s possession in favour of a court-appointed receiver, applying the discretionary principle that the liquidator&#039;s custody is ordinarily preferred to avoid conflict with winding-up administration; consequently the applicants were ordered to pay the Official Liquidator&#039;s costs. The operative ratio states that, in competition between a receiver and a liquidator, the court will ordinarily preserve the liquidator&#039;s possession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:11:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1929 (8) TMI 7 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96527</link>
      <description>Secured creditors were granted leave to continue a pre-existing mortgage suit during winding up to quantify their charge, but the court refused to displace the Official Liquidator&#039;s possession in favour of a court-appointed receiver, applying the discretionary principle that the liquidator&#039;s custody is ordinarily preferred to avoid conflict with winding-up administration; consequently the applicants were ordered to pay the Official Liquidator&#039;s costs. The operative ratio states that, in competition between a receiver and a liquidator, the court will ordinarily preserve the liquidator&#039;s possession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1929 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>