<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (11) TMI 547 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96501</link>
    <description>Boxes and pallets made from rejected axles were treated as excisable goods because they emerged from manufacture, had a distinct commercial identity, and marketability was shown by evidence that pallets were purchased in the market. The duty challenge on the basis that the goods were made by job workers also failed, as no evidence showed independent manufacture by third parties and the goods were found to have been made in the appellants&#039; factory. Excise liability was therefore sustained against the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:33:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (11) TMI 547 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96501</link>
      <description>Boxes and pallets made from rejected axles were treated as excisable goods because they emerged from manufacture, had a distinct commercial identity, and marketability was shown by evidence that pallets were purchased in the market. The duty challenge on the basis that the goods were made by job workers also failed, as no evidence showed independent manufacture by third parties and the goods were found to have been made in the appellants&#039; factory. Excise liability was therefore sustained against the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>