https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96487 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, rejected the Revenue's appeal in the case of Revenue vs. Respondents, ruling that processes such as bavelling, sand blasting, etching, and frosting on duty paid glass and mirror do not constitute manufacturing activities. This decision was based on previous orders that had already established the classification of these processes. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:24:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96487 The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, rejected the Revenue's appeal in the case of Revenue vs. Respondents, ruling that processes such as bavelling, sand blasting, etching, and frosting on duty paid glass and mirror do not constitute manufacturing activities. This decision was based on previous orders that had already established the classification of these processes. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96487