<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 454 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96482</link>
    <description>Amounts recovered in excess of actual freight, including related demurrage, jetty construction and survey expenses, were treated as transportation-linked charges and not part of manufacture or assessable value for excise. The excess freight recovery could not be added to the value for duty, and the related expenses were likewise excluded because they were attributable to movement of finished goods to the customer&#039;s nominated place. On that basis, the duty demand was not sustainable and penalties were not imposable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:06:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 454 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96482</link>
      <description>Amounts recovered in excess of actual freight, including related demurrage, jetty construction and survey expenses, were treated as transportation-linked charges and not part of manufacture or assessable value for excise. The excess freight recovery could not be added to the value for duty, and the related expenses were likewise excluded because they were attributable to movement of finished goods to the customer&#039;s nominated place. On that basis, the duty demand was not sustainable and penalties were not imposable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>