<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 361 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96470</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of mistake application, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the quantity discount and expenditure for retrieving bottles during the remand proceedings following Final Order No. 113/2001-A. The authority was instructed to assess whether these claims were permissible deductions for valuing the aerated waters produced by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 361 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96470</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification of mistake application, directing the adjudicating authority to reconsider the quantity discount and expenditure for retrieving bottles during the remand proceedings following Final Order No. 113/2001-A. The authority was instructed to assess whether these claims were permissible deductions for valuing the aerated waters produced by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>