<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 356 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, MU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96465</link>
    <description>The judgment clarified the conditions for admission before the Settlement Commission under Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962. It distinguished cases based on duty liability admission and importer status. The Commission allowed the application for one show cause notice where duty liability was admitted, outlining a payment plan. It emphasized compliance with filing requirements and the rights of other parties to seek settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=133524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 356 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION CUSTOMS &amp; CENTRAL EXCISE, MU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96465</link>
      <description>The judgment clarified the conditions for admission before the Settlement Commission under Section 127B of the Customs Act, 1962. It distinguished cases based on duty liability admission and importer status. The Commission allowed the application for one show cause notice where duty liability was admitted, outlining a payment plan. It emphasized compliance with filing requirements and the rights of other parties to seek settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=96465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>